Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Original Post Are they lovers or just good mates? by: Anonymous 163 posts 03/18/05 @10:28

here we go again... i would say; friends with benefits. (let's pray for it y'all.) see link by: Anonymous reply 1 03/22/05 @05:02 lesbos for sure by: Anonymous reply 2 03/22/05 @05:17 Naomi pings harder than most of the girls rumored here, imho. But I have always sided with Nicole is a-sexual crowd here at DL. I just didn't see her having sex at all in her lifetime, not even with herself. But I have to say, every picture of them together, Nicole seems to be really into Naomi. And not just, we are mates and like the same fotty team. She likes her the same way I like her. In fact, she actually seems attractive when with Naomi, maybe because she seems remotely happy. I hope they are. They will never come out, but they seem like they would be a good couple. by: Anonymous reply 3 03/22/05 @12:36 Even thought she did nothing to help her further her career when Nicole's was soaring and Naomi's was in the gutter. Naomi's too good for Nicole. by: Naomi Watts Troll #2 reply 4 03/22/05 @12:40 Reply 4, you have got to be kidding. The reason why Naomi is soaring now is because of being noticed because of her friendship(whatever is) to Nicole. Nicole's success eventually went to Naomi. You are so wrong on that point. by: Anonymous reply 5 03/22/05 @12:47 You have got to be kidding, #5. Did you see Mulholland Drive? Naomi was brilliant. THAT's what got her noticed. She has way more talent than Kidman. by: NW2 reply 6 03/22/05 @12:51 breast friends by: Anonymous reply 7 03/22/05 @12:53 Naomi says that her mother and Nicole were most important in helping her keep her spirits alive in Hollywood when she was getting nowhere. She said Nicole was wonderful to her and told her to never give up hope. I think they're very close friends and were possibly lovers at one point. But I don't think they're lovers now. Plus, Nicole seems to have actually developed a real relationship with Steve Bing, that rich, Hollywood playboy. by: Anonymous reply 8 03/22/05 @12:53 I don't get an asexual vibe from Nicole. I get a closet freak vibe from her. Same with Martha Stewart. They may look frigid but I bet they're secretly wild. And I think Naomi's hit it... by: Anonymous reply 9 03/22/05 @13:13 "Plus, Nicole seems to have actually developed a real relationship with Steve Bing, that rich, Hollywood playboy." Uh... Besides the fact that that whole thing seemed pretty contrived, she dumped him a month or two ago and was promptly linked to a rather gay-looking male producer (at Universal, IIRC). by: Anonymous reply 10 03/22/05 @13:17 I just saw pictures of Nicole and Steve Bing this week. They were in Sydney together. by: Anonymous reply 11 03/22/05 @13:42 Wehn you look at that picture and the way they are with each other-the body language and looks only say one thing- we are a couple. I have seen this in other pictures of them prior to the above and from a few years ago. I hope they are a couple-you should never let someone like that go that you look at that way. by: Anonymous reply 12 03/22/05 @19:11 the sad thing we will probably never ever know. :/ by: Anonymous reply 13 03/23/05 @00:06 omg - COME ON NOW. They SCREAM couple. That's the most chemistry I've seen in a photo in a long time. They have more chemistry than many married couple photos. Nicole didn't look at Tom like that. Plus, they're holding hands. Yeah - they're lovers now or were in the past. For sure. by: Anonymous reply 14 03/23/05 @00:17 I've seen one photo that's been posted here several times where they're foreheads are nearly touching. It looks like an engagement announcement photo. Sure, call it projecting, maybe it is, but I agree with those who say their body language hints at an intimacy "just good friends" just don't have. by: Melanie Wilkes-Booth reply 15 03/23/05 @00:25 I don't agree that that picture screams couple. Those are pictures of two longtime friends, beautiful women who know they are beautiful, enjoying themselves at a party. by: Anonymous reply 16 03/23/05 @00:34 uh --- ok r16. sure. (n-a-i-v-e...) by: Anonymous reply 17 03/23/05 @00:38 isn't Bing the asshole who got Elizabeth Hurley pregnant, then denied he was the father, fought paternity testing... and promptly lost because the baby is HIS? Yup, thought so. He came off horrendously during that episode. Nicole, good luck with that. by: Anonymous reply 18 03/23/05 @00:48 is she the only one who will take him, is she THAT desperate?? eek, poor nicole. by: Anonymous reply 19 03/23/05 @01:21 Nicole is a great lady. You'll be hearing from my lawyers. I don't know this Naomi chick, but Nicole is 100% straight, buddy, you can take that to the bank. by: Tom Cruise reply 20 03/23/05 @01:39 Oh Thomas you can't fool us. by: Anonymous reply 21 03/23/05 @02:17 "two longtime friends, beautiful women who know they are beautiful, enjoying themselves at a party." Holding hands, knowing that they make a beautiful couple, enjoying the fact that they're hiding in plain sight. r16, did you see the one where Nicole had her arm around Naomi's shoulder and was gazing lovingly down her cleavage? It was on here a while back. I'll link it. see link by: Anonymous reply 22 03/23/05 @02:49 In fact, you might want to take a look at this thread. see link by: Anonymous reply 23 03/23/05 @02:51 aww look at the lovebirds! see link by: Anonymous reply 24 03/23/05 @03:01 this pic of them is VERY VERY gay. look at how nicole is caressing namoi's shoulder!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 25 03/23/05 @03:02 holding hands again? I say gay! see link by: Anonymous reply 26 03/23/05 @03:03 the lovers enjoying a laugh together by: Anonymous reply 27 03/23/05 @03:04 s see link by: r27 reply 28 03/23/05 @03:05 notice noami is there with her "boyfriend" heath ledger yet all her attention is on her sapphic love nicole!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 29 03/23/05 @03:06 they are about to make out!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 30 03/23/05 @03:07

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

oops pic in r25 here. SO GAY!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 31 03/23/05 @03:10 Naomi and Heath were Ted's favorite couple to trash before he started on Orlando and Kate. He doesn't like PR-on-speed, so that said it all to me. by: Anonymous reply 32 03/23/05 @03:19 R 25 & 26: Delete the second http:// in the link box when you copy a link. That's why your pictures aren't working. Look at the addresses in your address box at the top of your links and you'll see what I mean. by: Anonymous reply 33 03/23/05 @03:22 I work in the industry. Here's the scoop: Naomi is gay and wildly possessive and jealous. Nicole is bisexual and despite the cold exterior, is a sex freak who will try anything once. The two were involved at one point but are not any longer. by: Anonymous reply 34 03/23/05 @03:36 This picture is revealing. Would that be Nicole pressed up against Naomi and Naomi's hand on Nicole's leg? Obviously they have a hard time keeping off each other. Heath who...?? see link by: Anonymous reply 35 03/23/05 @03:37 thanks, lemme try again! lol see link by: Anonymous reply 36 03/23/05 @03:39 R35 I think it's the camera that makes them seem so close in that photo. Telephoto lenses compress space. If you see how naturally Nicole is standing, and leaning, she couldn't possibly be pressed against Naomi. There's space in front of Nicole, we just can't see it. by: Anonymous reply 37 03/23/05 @04:20 That may be true, r37, but I still see Naomi's left hand reaching back toward Nicole. The angle of the hand itself, not to mention the arm reaching. It also looks like Nicole's right hand is on Naomi's shoulder (again). You can see Nicole's knuckles there if you enlarge the picture. It looks to me like Nicole is definitely touching Naomi and Naomi is trying to touch Nicole. Heath is the definition of a third wheel in that picture. I stand by my original conclusion. by: Anonymous reply 38 03/23/05 @04:38 Oh please, neither of them are gay. Get off it! by: Anonymous reply 39 03/23/05 @04:50 R39, how do you know? by: My Name reply 40 03/23/05 @05:03 "Oh please, neither of them are gay. Get off it!" And George and Eric from "CSI" are just good friends, too! And that Rock Hudson was actually a straight man and he just got a bad rap! As for Garbo fucking chicks? Please. She just wanted to be left alone! Yeah, that's the ticket... by: Anonymous reply 41 03/23/05 @09:02 The picture from R26 is the most telling. There is something very intimate in the way their hands are positioned. Like they were letting go, but didn't want to. And they are quite a cute couple. by: Anonymous reply 42 03/23/05 @09:41 When you look at that picture and the way they are with each other-the body language and looks only say one thing- we are a couple. I have seen this in other pictures of them prior to the above and from a few years ago. I hope they are a couple-you should never let someone like that go that you look at that way. I posted this yesterday and after looking at the rest of those pictures(someone has a lot of time on their hands but I am glad for it), I am even more convinced. Though I do get the feeling that Nicole would be the more possessive type but you never do know about a person. by: Anonymous reply 43 03/23/05 @10:00 R43 I have to say that the pictures all point to Nicole looking much more possesive so I would have to agree. But who knows. by: Anonymous reply 44 03/23/05 @10:02 R39, you're so full of shit. And you're so straight it hurts. What are you doing on a gay gossip board? They're gay, and they've slept together. They look at each other exactly the way two women do who've been intimate in the past. It doesn't necessarily mean they are currently, but that spark is sexual chemisty that's been acted on, and that they still refer to. And as to how we know? I've said it before to the dumb, clueless straight women who scream they're just good friends who hold hands and wind their arms around each other (and allll beautiful women do that when they party together blah blah blah): because some of us have had platonic female friends and female lovers, and we can see the difference easily. I'm one of them. You can see it in person, and you can see it in some photos. Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts make it easy. Not all women do, but they sure do. Also, it's not like the rumors are new and surprising. They've been plentiful out of Australia and here for years. Remember that team on "Amazing Race" -- Bianca and Debbie -- whom we all knew were lovers even though they claimed only to be "best friends from the time we were kids"? They hugged, cuddled, and said "I love you" all the time. Lived together, etc. Very similar dynamic to the NK/NW relationship, but because they weren't celebs, nobody screamed when people said, duh, they're lovers. by: Anonymous reply 45 03/23/05 @10:16 gay! by: Anonymous reply 46 03/23/05 @10:28 That picture with Heath in it looks like Nicole was added-why would she be behind them so close-and it looks like Nicole from years ago with redder, curlier hair. Nice try. Though I agree totally with reply 45. by: Anonymous reply 47 03/23/05 @10:31 I think they're best mates and dirty flirts. I'm sure they pick up the tabloids on the way back from a big night schmoozing and squeal with laughter to see how much they've got away with. by: Anonymous reply 48 03/23/05 @10:39 They are lovers. by: Anonymous reply 49 03/23/05 @11:50 R48, you're straight, aren't you? by: Anonymous reply 50 03/23/05 @12:03 bump by: Anonymous reply 51 03/23/05 @14:15 If Naomi is gay and not even bi, where was Heath getting his kicks during the time he "dated" Naomi? Is he gay as well? Just asking. by: Anonymous reply 52 03/23/05 @14:31 R52, both people don't have to be gay or bi in a "relationship" that is orchestrated by publicists. The other person is getting something out of it, although what it is may not be obvious. It may be money, it may be more exposure than they'd get on their own. It may be their own little piece on the side, paid in full. You need to learn how Hollywood really works. It's ALL about image. by: Anonymous reply 53 03/23/05 @14:40 r47 - The pic you refer to is not tampered with - it is from the opening of the ring in LA - there are a million pics from the event. by: Anonymous reply 54 03/23/05 @14:59 Oh, and R45 - I love you. by: R54 reply 55 03/23/05 @15:04 \ by: Anonymous reply 56 03/23/05 @17:10 have they ever been an BI?? as a couple/lovers i mean? solo, Nicole was a BI once during her break-up with Tom. it was hinted that she really enjoyed women instead, she practically was outed as a bisexual. i think it was in the NY Daily or something Daily at least :D never read an gay BI on Naomi though. by: Anonymous reply 57 03/23/05 @20:43 "Are they lovers or just good mates?" More like nearly identical twins. Could they look more alike? by: Anonymous reply 58 03/23/05 @21:31 I don't think they look anything alike... by: Anonymous reply 59 03/23/05 @21:45 I work in the industry. Here's the scoop: Naomi is gay and wildly possessive and jealous. Nicole is bisexual and despite the cold exterior, is a sex freak who will try anything once. The two were involved at one point but are not any longer. I always got that vibe from other pics I've seen. It always looks like Naomi is looking adoring at Nicole with that "I'm in love" gaze. Not so much on Nicole's part. Naomi looks scream "longing." by: Anonymous reply 60 03/23/05 @22:02

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

true by: Anonymous reply 61 03/23/05 @22:44 bumpedy-bump by: Anonymous reply 62 03/24/05 @06:35 lol by: Anonymous reply 63 03/24/05 @09:08 Both scream gay.No doubt about that. by: Anonymous reply 64 03/24/05 @14:48 Naomi is so much hotter, shorter and more talented than the former Mrs. Snooze. At least she worked for her career and didn't beard for it. Cheers to Naomi. by: Anonymous reply 65 03/24/05 @16:36 Yeah Naomi sure did work for her career. Right into Nicole's pants. As soon as that divorce was final - Nicole pushed the hell out of Naomi's career. She does have the talent to get it done - but so do a whole lot of people without powerful people to help them. Plus, she is too bearding for her career - she is hardly honest screaming about her relationship with merkin Heath Ledger. He is as much of a whore as Kidman is. by: Anonymous reply 66 03/29/05 @17:20 should be SHE is as much of a whore. Sorry, english is not my primary language. by: Anonymous reply 67 03/29/05 @17:21 lovers by: Anonymous reply 68 03/29/05 @17:24 actually no, david lynch was the one who lauched naomi's career. by: Anonymous reply 69 03/30/05 @07:16 Naomi and Nicole have known each other since they were teenagers, R66. Why would Nicole decide to "push" Naomi's career 15 years after they met? by: Anonymous reply 70 03/30/05 @09:41 Naomi once contemplated suicide What kind of a lover/BFF is Nicole to let Naomi wander the streets destitute? Naomi could do so much better ;) see link by: Anonymous reply 71 04/01/05 @14:42 Nicole is worth tens of millions and her best pal is living out of a car? I would at least have my friend live in the pool house. by: Anonymous reply 72 04/01/05 @19:39 I made a gallery of all the pics if them together I could find. And no, I really don't have anything better to do. see link by: Anonymous reply 73 04/01/05 @19:50 For fuck's sake, after looking at those pictures the only thing that could make them seem gayer is footage of them going down on each other. Imagine if two famous, supposedly straight men carried on with each other like that. by: Anonymous reply 74 04/01/05 @19:55 Wow, r71, I had no idea it was that bad. And yet Naomi dropped everything and moved in with Nicole to deal with her issues after Tom left? Even if they aren't/weren't lovers what the hell kinda friendship is that?! by: Anonymous reply 75 04/01/05 @20:08 r72, i don't think Nicole never offered her a place to stay, i think Naomi really wanted to this own her own. that's the impression i got. she has stated in interviews that she used to crash at Nic's sofa from time to time. (i'm guessing by this she means guest room/house) by: Anonymous reply 76 04/01/05 @20:22 The gallery, loves it! I don't know if they are girlfriends, but I do know that is the most believable romantic partner I have ever seen Nicole Kidman with. She and Bing are just friends ... she recently showed him around Australia when he was down there for business. And other rumored boyfriends of hers ... Lenny Kravitz or Q-Tip ... please! And as for the biggest red flag: Tom Cruise was never believable with her as a loving husband. Believe me, I know! by: Pat Kingsley, Lesbian Publicist reply 77 04/01/05 @20:24 You bitches are all so fucking ridiculous. Seriously. R74 has completely set me off: Female celebrities ALWAYS carry on this way at premieres. Remember when Charlie's Angels premiered and those three bitches were playing with each other's hair and shit on the red carpet? No one objected because these are women acting gay. It's the same here--these two may have had sex in the past, but cripes, but God, don't try to tell me that these pictures are any kind of proof to back up that theory. by: Anonymous reply 78 04/01/05 @20:28 when together, it definitely screams GAY! by: Anonymous reply 79 04/01/05 @20:29 take your meds, r78. i can think of other female friends (Meryl Streep and Carrie Fisher, for example) who are affectionate, but not THAT affectionate. constantly holding hands or near each other physically? do your female friends do that? i doubt it. by: MM reply 80 04/01/05 @20:30 No, they don't, but they're not celebrities who like to have their pictures taken. I'm not convinced, and I won't be by crappy pictures that really aren't at all sexual. by: R78 reply 81 04/01/05 @20:34 R74- NICE And i agree by: Anonymous reply 82 04/01/05 @20:40 Why can't all you negative people just be happy for them? by: Anonymous reply 83 04/01/05 @20:45 They are just touchy-feely, a lot of straight women friends are like that. In college my 2 roomates were like that, they would sleep in the same bed and "cuddle"... (lol... reading what I just typed really makes them sound like lesbians but I swear they aren't) by: Anonymous reply 84 04/01/05 @20:47 I agree that actresses are often affectionate with each other but this goes above and beyond any other famous actress friendships I've ever seen. That gallery R73 put together, you couldn't do that with any other famous friends of any gender. They're more couple-y in their photos than either of them have been with anyone else in their entire careers and that includes a 10-year marriage on Nicole's part. Obviously not everyone will agree but I grew up with straight women and a lot of my friends are straight women and there is normal physical closeness between best friends and then there's "I had her clit in my mouth last night" closeness. by: R74 reply 85 04/01/05 @20:48 I think that the only thing those pictures prove is that these two have a genuine, loving relationship. Whether lovers or not, they LOVE each other, and that says a lot in Hollywood. As a bi-woman, I've had straight girlfriends with whom I've been just as affectionate as these two in the pictures. Personally, I'd bet they've been together sexually, but I think that the core of their relationship is a deep love and friendship. And that's beautiful. by: Anonymous reply 86 04/01/05 @20:50 R78, because you're the expert on reading photographs now? Give me a break. Why is your opinion of the pictures any more valid than any of ours? Sounds like you know less about having a girlfriend than a lot of us do. Besides, if you'll grant that they were probably together at one time, what's your hang-up about "not seeing it" in the pictures? Just because you don't doesn't mean we're projecting? It might mean your gaydar's worse. You sound pissed at that fact, frankly. And very overwrought about it all. But at least you don't sound homophobic, and that's a breath of fresh air on this thread. R84, you sound young and very naive. You also sound straight. Comparing two lesbians to your roommates is pointless. Try comparing them to a lesbian couple you know; it'll get you farther. If your post included, "whereas my gay best friends hold each other in a much more intimate way," I'd actually think you knew something about the subject. As it is, I think you're just putting your heterocentric opinion into the thread (at least in a nice way), just as all straight people inevitably do. My gf and I slept in the same bed and cuddled, too. You see? There's a difference, and you're missing it, because you only see one side of things. You have to know both sides to get it. by: Anonymous reply 87 04/01/05 @20:56 Wow, loving the gallery, thank you! r86, loving your post! :) and i agree. by: Anonymous reply 88 04/01/05 @21:17 ( r73, are you Swedish? cause your web host is, nice meeting other Sweds on DL ) by: Anonymous reply 89 04/01/05 @21:24 I am actually. :) Wow, didn't think any other Swedes would be up this late, hehe. by: r73 reply 90 04/01/05 @21:41

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Well, whatever they are - they are gorgeous together. I don't know how they could keep their hands off each other even if they were straight. I tend to think no one could be that straight. by: Anonymous reply 91 04/01/05 @21:53 ^love that comment! by: Anonymous reply 92 04/01/05 @22:26 r73, well i never sleep! too busy gossiping, heh. great gallery! :D by: r89 reply 93 04/01/05 @22:33 That's the warmest and most alive I've ever seen Nicole, on or off-screen. She usually seems frozen...there is no way she is not in love with Naomi. With Tom she looked like a cardboard cutout, it was so fake and cold compared to her photos with Naomi. The two women seem to make each other very happy. by: Anonymous reply 94 04/02/05 @02:38 NOT lesbians. Next! by: Anonymous reply 95 04/02/05 @02:50 Nicole and Naomi make such a cute couple. Just looked at all those pictures r73 posted. All I can say is 'Gay! Gay! Gay!'. I really wish Nic and Naomi stayed together. I see real love there. by: Anonymous reply 96 04/02/05 @03:22 Lovers or not, there definitely is love between them. by: Anonymous reply 97 04/02/05 @04:23 I LOVE those two together! Beautiful. I really wish those two would come out as a couple. It is very obvious by seeing the pictures. P.S. I'm a straight female and I definitely see the chemistry between them. by: Anonymous reply 98 04/02/05 @06:02 Naomi wanted to do it on her own? Trust me when you're struggling trying to make it in Hollywood, contemplating suicide and your best friend is a mega-movie star, you'll take any bone you can get. I'm sure she would've appreciated any help Nicole could've given her. From what I understand (I have a friend who's a journalist), Nicold did NOTHING to help Naomi. I'm sure now, in retrospect, it makes Naomi feel all the better because she did do it on her own w/out any help from Nicold who was her "friend" throughout the period when she was down and out. by: Anonymous reply 99 04/02/05 @11:43 She's said several times that Nicole tried to set up appointments w/ directors for her, and they would come out of courtesy for Nicole, but weren't very receptive. I would hardly call that 'nothing'. And let's remember, Nicole wasn't nearly as big of a star as she is now. Back then, she was still largely known as 'Mrs. Cruise'. I doubt Naomi would bad-mouth Nicole to any 'journalist', seeing as how every other article she talks about Nicole's encouragement. With that said, I don't think they're lesbians. Nice pics though. by: Anonymous reply 100 04/02/05 @17:11 Sorry not lesbians. Those photos show nothing, except that they attended 3 premieres together. BFD. by: Anonymous reply 101 04/02/05 @18:28 there's def. chemistry between them, and i can only HOPE that are/were lovers, cause that is serious hotness! still, maybe they're just good friends, but oh the chemistry. by: Anonymous reply 102 04/03/05 @19:02 There is not way that those two women, based on those pictures, are not lovers or were lovers. Agree with 102, 97 and 98 and any other post that see's the love., how can you not? I saw one of those pictures in the gallery and thought something of them. After seeing all of them I am 100% convinced. You can feel it from the pictures-I have never seen Nicole looks like that with someone or for that matter most Hollywood couples. I hope they are together or were together and still friends-if you find someone that makes you look and feel like that, you don't want to let it go. Very Hot. Poster children for truly being into a person-gay or straight. by: Anonymous reply 103 04/03/05 @20:54 They are soooo or were a couple! The fact that Nicole is holding Naomi's wrist when Naomi is holding her purse/handbag, tells me that she is definitely Nicole's (at the Ring Premiere). It's like Nicole is saying...she belongs to me, not Heath! They just will not let go...they even have a pinky grip! Come on people, it's quite obvious! by: Anonymous reply 104 04/03/05 @22:47 Wishful thinking. Nicole has already stated she is not attracted to women. As for Naomi, who knows? But the two of them are just friends. But by all means, keep dreaming... by: Anonymous reply 105 04/03/05 @23:13 ^Yeah. And Tom has stated his not into guys. Go figure... by: Anonymous reply 106 04/04/05 @09:41 Doubt away, 100. I'll believe my friend. After all, I've known her for 12 years and her celebrity insight has always been right on. Besides, my opinion isn't tainted by a crush on Nicole Kidman where I can't believe what a cold bitch she might actually be in real life. Yours clearly is. by: 99 reply 107 04/04/05 @11:18 LMAO I've never been accused of having a crush on any woman! Besides Nicole is automatically on my shit list for that horrible Chanel ad, therefore, I could care less if she's a cold bitch, I'm merely pointing out the facts. Besides from my apprehension that Naomi would bad-mouth her friend to the press, everything I stated is a fact. I'm not going to link it for your lazy ass, use google. Geez man, Defensive much? by: Anonymous reply 108 04/04/05 @11:41 Oh, to be in a Nic-me-Naomi sandwich.... yummm by: Anonymous reply 109 04/07/05 @00:46 just saw nicole on ellen (it was a repeat)....why doesn't naomi tell her girl to ease up on the botox. by: Anonymous reply 110 04/08/05 @00:02 appearently i'm not the only one who likes spending time at places like Forty Deuce. meow. see link by: Anonymous reply 111 04/08/05 @00:46 that's hot r111. thank you. by: Anonymous reply 112 04/08/05 @00:50 I think that Nicole used to post as tj_in_socal on the old E-online gossip message board. Anyone who tried to debate tj/nicole would get a strip torn off them. Uber/mega-competitive bitch. by: Anonymous reply 113 04/08/05 @03:09 ^haha, i think not. by: Anonymous reply 114 04/08/05 @03:14 r114-Ooooooh, I think so. by: Anonymous reply 115 04/08/05 @03:23 so lesbo,they think they have the world fooled! by: Anonymous + reply 116 04/08/05 @03:31 r114, come on now, ever heard of fangirls or whatever doing their best to impersonate their idols. plus some nutcases living their lives as if they were the stars IRL. that wasn't Nicole. jeez. by: Anonymous reply 117 04/08/05 @03:40 I agree with 102 and friends. No idea what the nature of their relationship is, but bow down to the mighty chemistry. I really want to believe this. see link by: X-Files reply 118 04/08/05 @04:56 Haha, that's awesome r118, mind if I put that up in the gallery? by: r73 reply 119 04/08/05 @08:12 Wow, you really want to? Go ahead, thanx! by: R118 reply 120 04/08/05 @08:35

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Sure, I thought it was funny. Thank you :) see link by: r73 reply 121 04/08/05 @08:58 r118. that is waaaay funny. i love you!! by: Anonymous reply 122 04/08/05 @13:52 definitely in love. lovers? maybe not. by: Anonymous reply 123 04/08/05 @19:39 I've been thinking for a while now that Nicole is deliberately dropping hints. There's the oogling and snuggling with Naomi, but she's also been snuggling up with many other female costars at promotional events. But mostly, for a supposed straight woman, she's awfully fond of playing the pronoun game at talkshows and in interviews. The recent pregnancy interview that was posted here was really extreme: "I'd absolutely love to have a baby, although I'd want to do it with a partner. It would be so lovely to have a life with somebody where you bring up a child together." "I'm hoping to meet someone and be happy with them." "I don't want perfect. I like all of the flaws, and I like discovering all the things that make up a complicated, interesting person who can keep me fascinated. Perfect? I'd be bored." She manages to talk about making and raising babies without using a single male pronoun! see link by: Anonymous reply 124 04/08/05 @20:46 I don't see it. they seem chummy but in love? wishful thinking. by: Anonymous reply 125 04/08/05 @21:37 You people with your "wishful thinking" crack me up. What in fuck do you think we're wishing for? A night with Nicole, or do you honestly think we bi and gay people are all so poorly adjusted that we're gasping for celebrities to be exactly like us to validate our sad little lives. Got news for you. We live, love, work, and succeed. Have families, do great. We're on the internet yakking about who's gay for the same reason as anyone else -- for fun. We're slightly more pissed that people lie. OK, maybe a lot more pissed. But mostly, we're one fuck of a lot more clued-in than you hets about when they are. It's you straight people who wish everyone in Hollywood were straight as their PR mavens say they are. They aren't. They also aren't as un-nipped and un-tucked, as drug-free, as happy, as smart, as serene, as wise, or as happily paired off as the articles say. Wise up and get cynical. It's the only way to live. by: Anonymous reply 126 04/08/05 @21:47 You may speak the truth R126, but it still does not mean Nicole and Naomi are together. I do not see two women in love. I see two women who know each other really well and very comfortable with one another. Most female celebrities have phoney superficial relationships, so these two seem very different because of it. by: Anonymous reply 127 04/08/05 @21:53 That gallery is great! Good job. And I dont know if they are lovers, but what a great thought! I absolutely love Naomi. yum. by: misfit reply 128 04/08/05 @22:10 I completely agree with R127. by: Anonymous reply 129 04/09/05 @01:11 >>>I work in the industry. Here's the scoop: Naomi is gay and wildly possessive and jealous. Nicole is bisexual and despite the cold exterior, is a sex freak who will try anything once. The two were involved at one point but are not any longer. I believe. by: Anonymous reply 130 04/09/05 @09:48 Nicole a sex freak? No. Not by Hollywood standards. Total bullshit. by: Anonymous reply 131 04/09/05 @12:36 Who did Naomi date before Heath? by: Anonymous reply 132 04/10/05 @17:18 bump by: Anonymous reply 133 04/10/05 @20:27 they are such a pretty couple! by: Anonymous reply 134 04/10/05 @20:33 Wait, so "Mulholland Drive" was life imitating art for Naomi? Nicole Kidman = the Laura Elena Harring character Tom Cruise = Justin Theroux by: Anonymous reply 135 04/10/05 @20:48 Art imitating life... David Lynch knew Naomi before he made the story into what it is now. by: Anonymous reply 136 04/10/05 @21:00 it is kinda funny in a way that David come up with the whole lesbian thing AFTER Naomi was cast. it was a straight storyline in the beginning. r132. she dates some quite well known director guy, i think they were together for 2/3 years. by: Anonymous reply 137 04/11/05 @08:49 Nicole is deliberately drops hintt and the making time with Naomi, but she's also been with up with many other female costars at promotional events. by: Anonymous reply 138 04/12/05 @16:47 r138, English isn't your first language, is it? by: Anonymous reply 139 04/12/05 @17:01 Her old buddy Naomi Watts, whose career has only recently taken off, told me, “Nicole was always there with her door open, her arms open, her ears open – just what you need.” see link by: Anonymous reply 140 04/12/05 @17:23 Nicole, you said earlier that it’s unbelievable to be sitting here at the table with Naomi. Kidman: It’s beautiful. It makes me cry, actually, because Naomi’s like my sister. I am genuinely... [Kidman sees that Watts is tearing up and starts tearing up herself. Kidman laughs.] Oh, God, now you’ve started it! Kidman: This is not that kind of friendship where it’s like, “Oh, yeah, we were friends.” We’ve shared boyfriends, breakups, bottles of wine when we thought our lives were over. I mean, every single thing you can imagine. She moved into my house when I got divorced and took care of me. And now we sit at this table. From Australia. That’s kind of wild, really. see link by: Anonymous reply 141 04/12/05 @17:24 Good lord, they are good friends. It is possible for two women to care for one another without sex being involved. by: Anonymous reply 142 04/12/05 @19:38 oh faggot shut up 142 by: Anonymous reply 143 04/12/05 @19:49 The director that Naomi was "involved" with was Stephen Hopkins who is known to be a big old queer. Add to that the fact that he (Hopkins) also dated Heather Graham who dated Heath Ledger before Naomi and you have one very tangled web. Oh, and let's not forget that Sandy Bullock also "dated" Heath before Naomi and Heather G. As far as Tom Cruise being "The Director" in Mulholland Drive. Check out the link. Baz did this photoshoot. Look a little more deeply at Moulin Rouge as well. Don't ever say I didn't do anything for you. The pissing on about finding a hubby is annoying me - otherwise, I would not even post on this thread because I wouldn't want them to be outed. see link by: Sugar. reply 144 04/14/05 @14:10 So did you just out them? I don't get it... by: Anonymous reply 145 04/14/05 @14:45 Thanks Sugar. "Look a little more deeply at Moulin Rouge as well." Not sure what we're supposed to see? by: Anonymous reply 146 04/14/05 @18:17 Going on a treasure hunt for clues is retarded. So far I have heard or seen nothing to support that they are lovers. Mind you it would be nice if they were some real gossip. A bunch of cozy photo ops at premieres does not cut it folks. by: Anonymous reply 147 04/14/05 @20:53 It would make my day if Naomi Watts was gay. Honestly though I think she's probably straight, not that I have any proof either way. by: Anonymous reply 148 04/18/05 @07:21 from the Post: "AUSSIE RULES What's up with Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts? The good friends were on totally different wavelengths and didn't pay much attention to one another at the Bungalow 8 after-after-party for Kidman's film "The Interpreter" elegant MoMA premiere. Kidman sat calmly and left early while Watts partied late with a gaggle of girlfriends, alongside Sean Penn, Kelly Lynch, and Julian Schnabel." by: Anonymous reply 149 04/25/05 @13:45 "Nicole Kidman, Naomi Watts: Game Over? It seems that the close friendship between Aussie actresses Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts may be over. Buzzle Staff Editor, 3/3/2004 2:59:00 PM Nicole Kidman helped her friend Naomi Watts break into Hollywood and it may just end their friendship. It has been reported that Kidman lost out on a coveted role to Watts, and the jealousy may just be too much for Kidman and Watts’ relationship to withstand. As Watts’ popularity grows, the professional rivalry between the two could be the end of their friendship. Watts’ riveting performance as a drug addict in 21 Grams has cemented her spot in Hollywood. She reportedly won the role Kidman was vying for in I Don’t Know How She Does It. Kidman’s star has shone brightly the past few years, but after awhile it gets old seeing the same face in every new movie. Watts is new to the scene. A source says, "Naomi is the flavor of the month and she comes at a fraction of the cost of getting Nicole." Not for long. With Watts star on the rise, her asking price per movie will rise as well. Watts is fairly new to Hollywood. Her first big break was in David Lynch’s mystery Mulholland Drive. She then starred in the thriller The Ring and Le Divorce. Since bursting on the scene she has remained a steady actress and her upcoming projects include I Heart Huckabees, The Ring 2, We Don’t Live Here Anymore, The Assassination of Richard Nixon, and of course the role "she stole" from Kidman. Fame comes with a price…and what is the cost of a friendship? In Hollywood, that cost appears to be a starring role in a movie!" see link by: Anonymous reply 150 04/25/05 @14:53

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  of 7

"WATTS: NO RIVALRY BETWEEN NICOLE AND ME Australian OSCAR nominee NAOMI WATTS has angrily denied reports she and NICOLE KIDMAN are being torn apart by career rivalry - insisting she never wants her best pal's level of fame. Kidman and Watts have been close pals ever since meeting at an audition in their native Australia when they were youngsters. And while Kidman went on to a high-profile marriage to TOM CRUISE and is now considered one of Tinseltown's greatest actresses, Watts' has had a steadier rise to fame. But the 21 GRAMS actress is quick to refute suggestions that competition for plum parts has caused a rift between them, following reports they fell out over new movie I DON'T KNOW HOW SHE DOES IT because Watts secured Kidman's "dream role". She says, "I've watched her deal with things in incredible ways. It's always been a twin goal of mine that I could be successful and at the same time maintain anonymity. "I don't want to be someone who's watched by everyone. I want to be the observer still. Acting is about being a blank canvas. And celebrity takes that power away. "I've certainly never been jealous of Nicole." 09/03/2004 14:42" see link by: Anonymous reply 151 04/25/05 @14:53 didn't she go to nicole's latest premiere? things can't be that frosty. by: Anonymous reply 152 04/25/05 @15:39 Naomi was at Tribeca, but Nicole basically ignored her. And it was Naomi that said there was no rift, Nicole hasn't said anything. by: Anonymous reply 153 04/25/05 @15:45 Sydney Pollack said he considered only Nicole, Charlize and Naomi for The Interpreter. Naomi's losing the part didn't destroy the friendship. Nicole and Naomi are now 2 of the hottest few actresses in Hollywood (at least for the short term until one or both them starts to fade - which is likely to happen in the next couple years, as it does with every mid 30s actress). So they'll be fighting for parts. I'm sure they understand that. If one of them loses a role, at least the other gets it. They've been friends for 15 years. I have a feeling all this gossip about them competing is bullshit. by: Anonymous reply 154 04/25/05 @17:48 The rift isn't supposed to be about "The Interpreter" though, but about "I Don't Know How She Does It", which would be the first time Naomi was picked over Nicole, if true. But it looks pretty lame and low-budget (which is why they went with Naomi) so I don't see why Nicole should be that pissed off about it. by: Anonymous reply 155 04/25/05 @18:26 Naomi may not mind being passed over for Nicole. She has played second banana forever. Nicole may be a different story. Getting passed over for Naomi might not sit well with her. I could see Nicole being jealous. I don't think Nicole loves anyone but her career and nobody better mess with that. by: Anonymous reply 156 04/25/05 @21:41 i wish they were in love....theyd be one hot lesbian couple!! probably the hottest ones out there!!! i'm not into the whole steven bing thing with nic, he totally left liz hurley when he knocked her up and that is not cool, nic deserves someone better, and naomi could be the one by: Anonymous reply 157 04/26/05 @15:01 Naomi got paid $15 MM for King Kong so I'd hardly call her low budget. And how much do you think Nicole got paid for Birthday Girl or Birth or that Lars Von Trier thing she did a year ago? Both of them can command big paychecks (by the standards of actresses, if not actors) but both will also do lower budget films if the project is right. And according to this link, Nicole is attached to I Don't Know How She Does It, not Naomi. see link by: Anonymous reply 158 04/26/05 @15:08 they would make a better looking couple than nicole and bing. by: Anonymous reply 159 04/26/05 @22:00 Naomi bump by: Anonymous reply 160 04/27/05 @09:26 R6, I disagree that Watts has more talemt, she was good in MR but everything else she has overacted her way through, it is like someone screaming in her ear, "act, Naomi, act". When she has given as many performances as Kidman has in things like TDF, The Others, MR!, Birthday Girl, Dogville, Birth then I might be convinced. MD is one movie, in WDLHA, 21 Grams she was close to be overly melodramatic, in IHH she was unnoticeable, Le Divorce was the same thing. I will wait for her to do a character that calls for her to be subtle but for now, all she has got is MH. by: Anonymous reply 161 04/28/05 @07:26 Kidman fall out over a role, she just won the role of playing Diane Arbus and is off to Shanghai to work with Wong Kar Wai and now she and Lars Von Trier have started discussing her coming back to do the last part of the USA trilogy. Watts may be a new face but her last efforts have been pretty dismal, Assasination of Richard Nixon was all Sean Penn, The Ring 2 was crap and Ellie Parker was dismissed critically at Sundance. Kidman's The Interpreter just claimed the domestic and international BO. Kidman was linked to I don't Know How She Does It because the author wanted her for the role, she never signed or said anything about it as one of her upcoming projects infact she has never mentioned it. This rumour that there was a rift was started last year by the UK tabloids and now because they didn't talk at a premiere party which by the way Kidman left to go to the Time 100 Influential party has been reported again, I find it quite risible. The role is not a "dream" role by any means, I have read the book, it is just a good role. Kidman probably won't deny or verify the rumour because as annoying as it is, it is also quite insulting to start defending your friendship with people that have no clue. by: Anonymous reply 162 04/28/05 @07:48 i spend last minutes reading all these messages about the greatest actress of today and i had no idea you could tell that much about it. i dont know if they are lovers but they certainly love each other, in a wide sense of way. whether it is love or friendship does not matter, they love each other, you can see that by the way they look at each other, the way they talk about each other. plus its nice to see two stars knowing each other since high school and still being friends. i love them. they are great actresses by: angie reply 163 04/30/05 @15:27 Another article on the rift. see link by: Anonymous reply 164 05/04/05 @04:19 Maybe they just had a fight.. big deal. They probably had some very good make up sex after. by: Anonymous reply 165 05/04/05 @06:35 seriously, i miss new pics of them together on premiers etc. Naomi did attend The Interpretor premiere a couple of days ago, but no candids of them with one another... i don't wanna believe the rumors about them not being friends anymore. cause then Naomi wouldn't have attented at all. they also went to the Chanel gala the other day, but seperatly. by: Anonymous reply 166 05/05/05 @23:56 I think that they noticed people catching on and backed up from attending functions together. I wouldn't worry about this lovers tift. They go too far way back to be done with each other completely. by: MTV whore reply 167 05/06/05 @00:01 R162--I haven't seen Dogville, but The Stepford Wives and Birth were just awful. I can't figure out what she did them. At least Watts is in pretty decent movies (Ring 2 she had to do under R1 contract). Now Nicole is coming out with Bewitched..hmm.. The Interpreter is the only decent movies she's done in the past 3 years. Naomi has King Kong with Peter Jackson coming out in December, Stay with Ewan McGregor and will be doing The Painted Veil with Ed Norton in the fall. If anything, her taste is much better. I wonder if I Don't Know How She Does It will be made, it's been sitting on a shelf since 2003--Nicole has 6 movies already lined up (including "American Darlings" with J.Lo--another example of her less than stellar choices)--when would she even find the time for this? by: Anonymous reply 168 05/06/05 @00:23 I wonder how Nicole's schedule looks like, she can't have any spare time at all. and oh, see Dogville. yes she may have done a lot of bad choices career wise, but that movie certainly wasn't one. by: Anonymous reply 169 05/06/05 @00:34 I just gotta say, from looking at pics and reading interviews, it really seems like Nicole likes Naomi more, any real life similarities with Mulholland Dr notwithstanding. It's pretty obvious Naomi was using the Nicole connection for publicity (do they have the same publicist or something btw?). But now she grumbles about being asked about Nicole, in pretty much the same way she grumbles about being asked about Heath Ledger. See the interview at link. see link by: Anonymous reply 170 05/06/05 @01:18 Nicole says: "It would be far easier to go 'Oh, I wish I loved women!' But I don't. I mean, I love them, but physically, they just don't do it for me. I love the way a man thinks. I love the way a man smells. I love the way men look...I'm hooked on the male physique--hooked on it!" by: Anonymous reply 171 05/06/05 @01:31 r171 that whole interview is very interesting: "PLAYBOY: Some women find J. Lo or, say, Angelina Jolie as sexy as men do. Is J. Lo a woman you'd be curious to kiss? KIDMAN: No, I don't want to kiss her. I don't want to kiss somebody I know. I'm quiet about my fantasies." see link by: Anonymous reply 172 05/06/05 @01:45 nope they don't have the same publicist, i'm quite sure. although Nicole used to fix audition for Naomi early on. I can understand if Naomi get tired of always being asked about her aussie friend (in EVERY interview Nicole is being brought up) but hey that's a part of the business i guess. and that Playboy interview is great, it's very telling I think. And btw, no way she could ever (if being bi/gay) admit that she is, then automatically Tom is also and HE would never allow that to come out. by: Anonymous reply 173 05/06/05 @03:39 According to the NY Post, Naomi, Nicole, Sean Penn and a few other celebs were spotted at dinner together earlier this week. Plus, both Nicole and Naomi were at the CFDA awards at the Metropolitan Museum on Monday night. I think the rift is purely manufactured by the tabloids. By the way, Naomi did Assassination of Richard Nixon as a favor to Sean Penn. It was a tiny part and he begged her to do it after they had worked together in 21 Grams. by: Anonymous reply 174 05/06/05 @06:56 sensuality or sexuality of nicole kidman is a mystery......asexual????? by: Anonymous reply 175 05/22/05 @17:46 She had to have sex with someone to get that miscarriage. And she's actually pretty candid in interviews in a weird way. She talks a lot about living in her own little fantasy world. by: Anonymous reply 176 05/22/05 @18:05 Bumpa to celebrate new pretty merkins. And BTW, look at the second hit, and where it links to: see link by: Anonymous reply 177 05/31/05 @19:49 How do you know that the miscarriage wasn't made up by her PR people just to generate sympathy? by: Anonymous reply 178 05/31/05 @20:26 Because you don't lie about something like that in the legal divorce papers when you've got the whole pack of scientology lawyers breathing down your neck. by: Anonymous reply 179 05/31/05 @20:56 I've always waffled on the are-they-were-they issue. But of all the photos, the one I find most telling is linked from R24. Nicole's eyes give her away. She is a big ol' lez...ping, Ping, PING! by: Dyke with fully-functioning gaydar reply 180 06/01/05 @00:37

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  of 7

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  of 10

I updated my gallery with a few more pics: see link by: r73, still nothing better to do reply 181 06/01/05 @02:28 bump for gallery update by: Anonymous reply 182 06/01/05 @16:34 bump for gallery update by: Anonymous reply 183 06/01/05 @16:34 There's an interesting timeline here. They avoided being seen in public since the Golden Globes, but that just seemed to increase speculation. But now that Naomi has got her new merkin they're going out together again. by: Anonymous reply 184 06/01/05 @16:47 I can't believe I forgot all about this little item from 2002: "WE HEAR . . . THAT the hottest spot in L.A. this minute is Ivan Kane's Forty Deuce, which he bills as "a back alley strip tease lounge." Nicole Kidman has been twice to see the dancers - once with her agent, and once with fellow Aussie actress Naomi Watts . . . " see link by: DL Archeologist reply 185 06/01/05 @23:05 r184, those "new" pics in the gallery isn't new per cee, those are all from GG and The Others premiere. so they haven't been seen together yet, but they did attend a Sting concert recently but no pics from the event. great gallery btw! by: Anonymous reply 186 06/03/05 @23:07 Yeah, I was referring to the concert, not the "new" pics that aren't new. Sorry, just too lazy to recap everything that was in the recent Nicole and Naomi threads. by: r184 reply 187 06/03/05 @23:47 that's ok! :) by: Anonymous reply 188 06/04/05 @01:40 great gallery! by: Anonymous reply 189 06/04/05 @04:47 hmmm... bump by: Anonymous reply 190 06/14/05 @03:57 Totally gay. The gallery is awesome! I'm sure there was no way that Naomi would attend the Ring premiere w/o Nicole. So, the happy threesome shows up. All of Naomi's energy in those Ring 1 premiere pics are either straight at the camera or towards Nicole. Luv it! by: Anonymous reply 191 06/14/05 @19:03 The most likely reply I've seen so far is from the industry insider who said that Nic and Naomi had a relationship that has since ended. And that Nic will try anything once with anybody and Naomi is 100% queer and very possessive/jealous of Nic. by: Anonymous reply 192 06/14/05 @20:09 Nicole is still very consistently playing the pronoun game in the interviews she's giving for Bewitched. It's always "someone", "a person", and even the awkward singular "them". (I can post some quotes if someone's interested.) Weirdest part is Letterman seems to do it too, he never uses male pronouns when talking about people she might date etc. Thing is, I don't get why she's doing it, since she still says she's very, very straight whenever asked about it directly. Maybe she really does have some weirdass contract with Tom Cruise. by: Anonymous reply 193 06/15/05 @07:34 ^I know, it crossed my mind many times as well, she almost only says men or man if somebody asked her specifically about men. It just ... I don't know what to think, but let's face it even if Nicole was bi/gay she could never come out, she would automatically out Tom as well plus get less roles in movies. Naomi.. well I remember watching Golden Globes and Nicole was nomitated for Birth, Naomi looked all cheerful when they said her name and then they went on revealing the winner's name (ugh, Hilary Swank) and she looked really pissed off and didn't even applaud although everybody around the table did and also Nicole with her happy face on. So I don't think Naomi is jealous, just really protective... by: Anonymous reply 194 06/15/05 @08:27 r193, I'd love some quotes! by: Anonymous reply 195 06/15/05 @09:14 Alright here's some quotes. "THE SUN: Do you still believe in love at first sight? KIDMAN: I don't think I ever believed in love at first sight. I have to get to know a person before I can have feelings for them." see link by: Anonymous reply 196 06/15/05 @10:04 "[Attraction] leaves me tentative. And it's a huge struggle not to cling to the wrong person, or seek solace from people who aren't necessarily going to protect you and love you. My life doesn't leave me with a lot to give to somebody else. I always said that if I fall deeply in love again I will not be able to continue in this way. That's why I would need someone to sweep me off my feet - because I probably wouldn't make a choice to give up what I'm doing otherwise." (compare the headline of the link to what she's actually saying... heh. I added the beginning from the magazine.) see link by: Anonymous reply 197 06/15/05 @10:11 Here's from when she was on Extra. She's pretty good at those double entendres. Video at link. Extra: "Once and for all set the record straight, would you truly rather have J-Lo's body?" Nicole: "Oh yeah..." Extra: "Get out, really?" Nicole: "Yeah, I wouldn't mind Angelina's as well, hahaha." Nicole: "But I think that, you know, destiny plays out in those things, and certain people are meant for certain things." see link by: Anonymous reply 198 06/15/05 @10:25 Now that's pronoun game deluxe - thanks for posting! by: r195 reply 199 06/15/05 @10:27 Entertainment Tonight, Nicole's "Perfect Man". Video at link again. Nicole: "I don't think you want a nasty person, but you want someone who's, uhm, yeah, a little kind of messed up a bit." Interviewer: "Rough around the edges.." Nicole: "..just a little bit.." Interviewer: "..with a good heart." Nicole: "Yeah, hopefully, that's hard to find." see link by: Anonymous reply 200 06/15/05 @10:32 Just one more while I'm at this. This one's older, from Leno from Febraury, but it's hella funny. It's a bit long so I won't transcribe all of it, but about halfway through this video she "accidentally" mentions that she kissed Rebecca at new years (Rebecca Riggs is the new years baby she's talking about), and then proceeds to freak out about it. see link by: Anonymous reply 201 06/15/05 @10:40 Now that you bring it up, I was watching her Letterman appearance again, and Dave actually said "I think a lot of people would be scared to invite you to go out to dinner." I know, could be nothing. But it does seem weird... why would he say "people"? In this situation especially, cause they were explicitly talking about dates. Big thanx for the links! by: Anonymous reply 202 06/15/05 @10:41 201, i remember her "slip" at Leno! loved it. by: Anonymous reply 203 06/15/05 @10:52 Last time she was on Letterman was even weirder (May 2004). That's what she meant when she told him this time that he's talked about her dating habits before. (I downloaded the transcript and can't find a link now... sorry). Letterman: Are you dating anybody? Nicole: Oh...here we go!! L. We don' t have to go over that. N. No...I don't date L. You don't date at all?! N. No. L. But you might one day. Someone might come along. N. Maybe..I'm not good at dating. I mean ..who is? L. well it's horrible. It's a frightening experience N. Yes, well not frightening... L. ..no ..not frightening..did I say frightening.. (laughing) N. It's just a hard thing to do...and also..and .... now is not the time to be discussing this. L. But if you were dating, if you wanted to date, how would that work, how would that facilitate itself.? Would somebody call you, would you call on somebody? Would you have an intermediary? Would you have a go-between? N. Well I'd give you my cell number... L. WHOAH!!! N. (laughs) L. WHOAH!!..wouldn't that be something! by: Anonymous reply 204 06/15/05 @10:53 >>>>>>>>Just one more while I'm at this Never mind, it's very appreciated. I didn't see the Leno clip before, I love it! by: Anonymous reply 205 06/15/05 @10:57 so Rebecca has both kissed her and Naomi... lucky girl I say! by: Anonymous reply 206 06/15/05 @11:03 I really like the way Nicole says "oooh yeeaahh" when talking about J-Lo. But she has lousy taste in women. J-Lo wtf! She's also called Paris Hilton pretty. by: Anonymous reply 207 06/15/05 @14:25 ^LOL... well at least she has taste in women, even though J.Lo is quite bad. and the girl(?) who keeps posting transcripts and links, I loooove you! by: Anonymous reply 208 06/15/05 @18:37 Haha, love you too. And yeah, I'm a girl. Another thing she does is she always refers to her female friends as "girlfriend". It was worst on Oprah: "I was with my girlfriend and we were trying on underwear", heh heh. And she likes to talk about how gorgeous her girlfriends are. She did this on Letterman too. I've got a couple of more videos, but I'm not sure if anyone is interested enough. One is ancient from SNL in 93, where she's doing the little dance Tom did in Risky Business. I'm pretty sure she's wearing men's underwear too, heh heh... I also have the Ellen interview from January, which was kinda funny. And the uhm, face licking from Practical Magic, but that might be a bit too esoteric... see link by: Anonymous reply 209 06/15/05 @19:29 haha yep. she's definetly...something. Bi-curious or bi at least. by: Anonymous reply 210 06/15/05 @20:11

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  of 10

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  of 10

209, who are you?? you're just as obsessive as I am, we should hang out and talk about important stuff like this! ;D by: r208 reply 211 06/15/05 @20:18 The new article in Vanity Fair is very flattering to Nicole. After watching her on Letterman the other night and after reading the article, I like her even more. by: Anonymous reply 212 06/15/05 @20:22 I think a lot of people is taking her side after this whole TomKat sitaution. by: Anonymous reply 213 06/15/05 @20:28 209 honey, if you wanna post the videos, I'd love to see them! by: Anonymous reply 214 06/16/05 @04:18 208: if you want to you can email me haibane AT gmail.com :) OK 214, more videos coming up, hehe. SNL Risky Business dance: see link by: 209 etc (blushing slightly) reply 215 06/16/05 @08:25 my GOD - I don't think kd lang could've been more butch doing that dance. awesome! thanx blushing girl! by: Anonymous reply 216 06/17/05 @04:51 It's even more fun when you compare it to Tom's original dance. He's much femmier looking, and a better dancer. Damn what a pair those two made. by: Anonymous reply 217 06/17/05 @06:06 ^LOL! true that. by: Anonymous reply 218 06/17/05 @08:18 bump by: Anonymous reply 219 06/21/05 @03:06 So what's the story with Liev, then? He's straight, from what I hear. Trying to give her a good profile before her big King Kong movie release? by: Anonymous reply 220 06/21/05 @03:14 Almost every "gay" woman I know has also slept with men. And many of these woman go from man to woman to man to woman - as if the sex of the partner were only one factor in the decision. (I'm a gay man so I can't really figure this out but gay women seem much more "flexible" regarding their sex partners than gay man who just go for dick.) Is it not possible that Naomi and Nicole were once lovers or had female lovers at one time but now sleep primarily - or exclusively - with men? by: Anonymous reply 221 06/21/05 @03:35 >>>>Almost every "gay" woman I know has also slept with men. And many of these woman go from man to woman to man to woman - as if the sex of the partner were only one factor in the decision. Hm. No. They would, if we need a label, be bisexual then, IMO. Into girls AND guys. by: Anonymous reply 222 06/21/05 @10:47 220, you might be on to something, since when her last big movie was about to premiered she hooked up with Heath Ledger. But King Kong isn't released until Christmas. A sighting of the pair from gawkerstalker btw: "was walking down lafayette between prince and spring around 7pm and look up and naomi watts is coming towards me and i look to her right and liev schreiber is there too. she is very fresh and beautiful in person and they were walking kinda far apart from each other and not talking- she's pretty average height too like 5 foot 3 which was surprising, liev seemed in his own world and she seemed spaced out- noone seemed to bother them or even notice them." see link by: Anonymous reply 223 06/21/05 @21:24 From Nicole's birthday: Speaking of love, Kidman has another wish: "For the person meant to come and find me, I would say: Come and find me soon!" see link by: Anonymous reply 224 06/22/05 @14:48 She's been officially single since what, 2001? Yet in most of her interviews after the break up with Tom she's talked about finding love again. Seriously, it can't be that hard for her to meet someone great unless she's into chicks... by: Anonymous reply 225 06/22/05 @20:21 Thanks for that, 224. The PERSON! That's a riot. by: Anonymous reply 226 06/23/05 @04:22 She never mentions the word "man" like, ever. see link by: Anonymous reply 227 06/23/05 @07:35 Nother new interview: Bewitched sells the notion of love at first sight, but Kidman doesn't buy it in real life. "I think you've got to get to know somebody," she said. "I'm shy and need it to be drawn out — to be coaxed out of my shell." "I'm very protective of who I am," she said. "I try to be very honest — emotionally honest. You do that so you don't get accused of lying or your authenticity gets challenged." see link by: Anonymous reply 228 06/23/05 @13:35 I just looked at the gallery. Nicole and Naomi look like two school girls together. They act like they're totally "bare" when they are around each other. You can see it in their faces. They look at each other like "Oh my god! We know something nobody knows." My girlfriend and I used to look at each other like that before people knew about us. Everyone thought we were just good friends til then. ...Hmmm... They're SOOOOOOO together. by: Anonymous reply 229 06/25/05 @02:20 Digital Dish Diva says: What is your ideal day? Nicole Kidman says: Oh! I think being with a person that I love, being able to walking in the woods, or I suppose hiking in the mountains and eat chocolate cake and lie in the sun when it's not too hot and knowing that I don't have to be anywhere at any particular time. see link by: It never ends reply 230 06/25/05 @07:36 What about Naomi then? Here she is at this event with Liev and they are now a couple... But she still pings SO hard! (and my gaydar are terrific btw) And I'm the only one who think she's looked a little bit haggard lately? r229 I agree, it's not so much that they're touchy with eachother but their facial expressions gives it away. by: http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/FrameSet.aspx?s=EventImagesSearch reply 231 06/25/05 @09:35 Damn, here's the link: see link by: Anonymous reply 232 06/25/05 @09:36 I don't buy that Liev is straight. He pings harder than Naomi does. And yeah, Naomi is just at the age where her looks start to fall apart. Time to get some work done. (It'll be interesting to see if she actually will have anything done). by: Anonymous reply 233 06/25/05 @10:03 Oh my god............ooooooooh my god: gay, as in: G.A.Y. as in: GGG.AAA.YYY !!! by: Anonymous reply 234 06/25/05 @10:04 I agree, Liev has be gay as well. He played a boyfriend to Neve Campbell in Scream right? He just screamed gay while playing that part. by: Anonymous reply 235 06/25/05 @10:11 Wow, they look like they're going to 2 different events - he to brunch and she to Lillith Fair. by: Anonymous reply 236 06/25/05 @11:30 If you notice, all those posts from someone "in the know" claiming he's straight on that thread were posted in the span of a few hours last Sunday. see link by: Anonymous reply 237 06/25/05 @12:10 Let's call them Nicomi!!! ...is that clever enough? Everyone start using it, and maybe it will catch on. by: Anonymous reply 238 06/27/05 @03:06 LOL @ r236. Indeed they do. by: Anonymous reply 239 06/27/05 @06:00 r232 - Naomi looks totally indifferent here like she could care less. ...Body languaaaage. by: Anonymous reply 240 06/27/05 @07:07

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  of 10

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  of 10

by: Anonymous reply 241 06/27/05 @07:25 More photos of her and Liev since we all know they're a couple in love... see link by: Anonymous reply 242 06/28/05 @09:45 I really like her clothes there. by: Anonymous reply 243 06/28/05 @10:16 I actually think "Nicomi" is adorable... we'll try to blend it in. by: Anonymous reply 244 06/28/05 @10:49 bump for Nicomi. by: Anonymous reply 245 06/30/05 @19:54 This may sound like a stupid question to you. But what the hell does "bump" mean? I've been trying to figure it out, but it just won't come to me. I'm sure it will be really obvious once someone explains. by: Anonymous reply 246 07/01/05 @00:32 A poster will "bump" a thread(ie write bump) just to keep it going if they don't have anything to say or add to the thread, but would like to see the thread stay active. If threads don't get hits they drift further back into the higher pg. numbers and eventually disappear. Does that answer your question, 246? by: Anonymous reply 247 07/01/05 @04:34 Is playing the pronoun game in absolutely every single conversation and interview an Australian thing or something??? The only thing I've ever read where she didn't play the pronoun game throughout the entire interview was the whole, extremely awkward and forced sounding, 'I love the way a man smells and thinks and pisses or whatever' thing from a couple months back. After reading all these posts on the last couple pages with her doing the pronoun dance I have no doubt that she is at least bi and is actually not hiding that fact anymore. You can't do that prounoun thing so often and so blatantly and not realize that you are doing it or that it is going to come across a certain way. It would be very easy for her to say 'man' in every one of those posts ('I'm just waiting for the right man') instead of the ubiquitous 'person'. The girl's definitely into chicks!! by: Anonymous reply 248 07/01/05 @04:52 Hehe, my mother asked me if she's gay. If you knew my mother, you'd know that that is definitely a sign that the girl just isn't fooling anyone anymore!! Well, it's either a sign of that or the impending apocalypse. I'll choose the Nicole is gay and ain't nobody fooled route. by: Anonymous reply 249 07/01/05 @04:59 Here's my theory: Nicole is talking a lot (and I do mean a lot) about honestly in interviews lately. She's probably tired of having to lie because of Tom Cruise. They most likely do have some kind of post-marriage contract stipulating what she can do and say. But a contract can't cover *everything* and it's likely the lawyers missed something as subtle as the pronoun game, so there's a loophole she's using, as much as she possibly can. You have to wonder if Tom and his minions have even noticed. A contract would be covering obvious things like answers to direct questions though, hence the awkward rants about "man-smell". by: Anonymous reply 250 07/01/05 @06:07 Don't you think celebrities who are vague about pronouns or use photo ops as exactly what they are - publicity - know what they're doing? They're getting press, getting people to talk about them. Good or bad, photos in US or InTouch or hundred post threads like us and mentions on gawker and defamer make these celebrities even more famous. And get them more free clothes and vactions and probably get them more money for their next movie. I think we're all being pretty naive if we don't think Nicole and Naomi know exactly what they're doing. And by the way, that doesn't get us any further in figuring out their relationship. Lots of smoke and mirrors in my opinion. I'll bet they slept together a couple times when they were young and have been platonic friends since then. But who knows? I could be totally wrong. by: Anonymous reply 251 07/01/05 @07:29 I can SO imagine Nicole coming home to her girl lover (whoever it may be) after that interview came out, and her lover, let's call her Naomi, goes: "You love the way a men SMELLS??" and they both burst out laughing. by: Anonymous reply 252 07/01/05 @07:32 r251, I agree completely. They were using their relationship for publicity (regardless of the true nature of that relationship). It's simple, two pretty women look better than one, and especially Naomi got a lot of mentions as "Nicole's best friends" that she wouldn't have otherwise. But they seem to have stopped now. I blame this thread! hehe. by: Anonymous reply 253 07/01/05 @09:13 now... that bummed me out. by: Anonymous reply 254 07/01/05 @10:04 Bumpity bump bumps...and that's not to move this thread up, that's what I believe these two do every time they see each other!! by: Anonymous reply 255 07/01/05 @15:14 lol @ r255. by: believer reply 256 07/01/05 @15:50 R247 - Wow, that's neat. So it's actually a technical thing? Thanks for explaining it to me! by: Anonymous reply 257 07/02/05 @01:22 I want to believe. by: Nicomi reply 258 07/02/05 @04:55 They really have stopped going to events together etc. I miss those old times. It can't be because of this thread lol, but it seems that they aren't PDAing any longer with each other. Did someone see Naomi at Live8 in Philly btw? She was presenting Keith Urban I think and I missed cause I watched the London event the whole time. (and still am) by: Anonymous reply 259 07/02/05 @18:48 r249, just out of curiosity why does she think Nicole is gay? just cause she's been single for such a long time? that's mainly one of the reasons my mom think someone's lesbian, heh. by: Anonymous reply 260 07/02/05 @18:50 I have no idea, R260. I didn't want to get into a whole discussion with her about it. I don't think it's because she's been single for a while though because my mother doesn't follow celebrity dating enough to even know that which is why I thought it was so strange that she asked me that at all. Hell, maybe she saw some pics in the paper of her groping and staring dreamily into Naomi's eyes and just put two and two together. But, really, when Midwestern, middle-aged, non celebrity following, semiconservative (although still Bush hating) and kind of prudish women like my mother are starting to come to the same conclusions that we do here on DL, there is definitely something going on there!! by: Anonymous reply 261 07/02/05 @19:33 ^LOL, yeah I agree, something has gotta to be going on since even your own mama' is aware! ;) by: Anonymous reply 262 07/02/05 @19:38 I find it peculiar that people (especially on here) just assume that she's straight. She was married to a gay man for ten years! I mean, really. by: Anonymous reply 263 07/02/05 @20:08 so.. she does from time to time mention how she really wants to find a good man to fall in love with, who would be great for her kids etc. before Tom she didn't have any official b/f's I think when she was big in AU. and after Tom she haven't had any either. seriously, how hard can it be for Nicole to find someone who would be willing to date her?! plus she's surrounded by actor hunks all the time. either she really is a loner or she prefers women. and i wanna know what the case is damnit! and well I loved her answer when she got the question what she first thought was the hottest thing with Tom and she answered his biceps! has that man ever worn anything with a long sleeve? ...the caption of this pic is kinda funny in a non lesbian way but still, plus look at her amazing body and the black hair suits her IMO! see link by: Anonymous reply 264 07/02/05 @20:40 "she does from time to time mention how she really wants to find a good man to fall in love with" Ahem... she talks about a "PERSON" to fall in love with. by: Anonymous reply 265 07/02/05 @20:44 ^uhm, not always. -->"Oh, no question. Give me the love. A great, enduring love that’s complete? Please. I’m there. And I think, in some ways, at the moment, my work is my love, because I haven’t found the man to love yet. Which I know is a terribly un-feminist thing to say. But it’s true. Still, I’m going to search and I’m also going to be incredibly picky, because in terms of my children, I can’t make a mistake. So I'd rather not have anyone then settle for the wrong person.«" but yeah I know she is really good at the pronoun game! this one sounds like something that I would say (nope, I'm not out): -->"I felt that that was it [with Tom], and if I believed there was only one person for me, I'd be in a very bad position right now. I think it's just whether or not you find that person-because I think there's probably a whole bunch of them-and it's a question of whether your paths cross at the time when they should. Because a lot of it is timing. That's something you have to give over to; you can't control it. You can tell yourself, Id rather have somebody then nobody, or, Oh well, they'll make a good companion or be someone to grow old with, but I'd rather be alone than in something that I felt compromised in. I want to be able to give everything. And I think that all goes back to the gravestone, when you see those two names together , where they're buried together, and I suppose that all links up to the incurable romantic: who's the person who will be sharing that with you? And I hope there's someone." Seriously! by: Anonymous reply 266 07/02/05 @22:34 She's a "pronoun pro." by: Anonymous reply 267 07/02/05 @22:45 "uhm, not always." No, but she has been extremely consistent in the last year or so. by: Anonymous reply 268 07/02/05 @22:48 Yes I do know that and I get your point, I'm just saying that Nicole does use the word "man" once or maybe even twice a year. ;) by: Anonymous reply 269 07/02/05 @22:52 It's terrific if they are real lovers. But do you think we will lose two great women knowing how to genuinely work on screen if they're out? by: Anonymous reply 270 07/03/05 @03:39

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  of 10

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  of 12

^Sadly, yes. Maybe not Nicole since she's already such a big celebrity and if they would handle it all really good maybe her career wouldn't be that much affected. Has any one of you got this pic in a bigger version? I thought I've already seen every pic of them together thanks to that nice gallery. see link by: Anonymous reply 271 07/03/05 @07:14 Whoa 271, is that pic for real?! Where'd you get it from? BTW, I just realised they've both been in New York for about a month now. I wonder if they're hanging out at all (not in public obviously). by: Anonymous reply 272 07/03/05 @07:25 R270 If they came out, I'd watch them MORE. I think knowing that a woman likes to get down with other women makes them so much more attractive. I'd love it!! by: Anonymous reply 273 07/03/05 @16:29 Actually Naomi was in Philadelphia yesterday as a presenter at the Live 8 concert. I'm bummed I missed it as I was watching London the whole time. And yes, thank god, that pic is real. by: Anonymous reply 274 07/03/05 @16:30 273, So would I, but I'm not straight. circa 90-95% of the population is straight and let's be honest it's not like most people will be all "gooooo lesbians!" and watch them more as well. I think that _some_ directors would think twice before hiring them in a straight part. (But I would loved to be proved wrong of course.) by: Anonymous reply 275 07/03/05 @16:41 i hate to burst your collective bubble. nicole and naomi are not lovers. naomi is straight. nicole i don't know about. by: Anonymous reply 276 07/03/05 @17:02 heh, i was wondering how long it would take for one of you to finally post in this thread. by: Anonymous reply 277 07/03/05 @17:40 ^Who are you refering to? The partypooper r276? Since you know Naomi is straight I take it you know her in firsthand? Otherwise you really don't know. Cause if you knew Naomi you most def have to know about Nicole. by: Anonymous reply 278 07/03/05 @17:49 yeah i mean 276... same crap in every naomi thread. but eh whatever. by: 277 reply 279 07/03/05 @18:03 hey 276, were have you been all this time? waiting for you to show up for three pages now. by: not letting you take the fun away reply 280 07/03/05 @18:03 missing an 'h' in 'where', but otherwise that's what I wanted to post. by: R280 reply 281 07/03/05 @18:05 Thanks @ 271 for picture. I've never seen that one before. by: Anonymous reply 282 07/03/05 @18:11 I love how r276 always makes negative comments and never replies on directed questions. I wanna see that picture in HQ. Damn. by: Anonymous reply 283 07/03/05 @19:25 Yeah, Naomi is sooooo straight. see link by: Anonymous reply 284 07/03/05 @19:40 So, I spent some time (ok, a long time) trying to hunt down a bigger version of the lovely pic r271 posted, but no luck sadly. On the plus side though, while hunting I found a bunch of pics that wasn't in the gallery already, so I have updated it. A few more pics added of Naomi and Rebecca at the bottom also. see link by: Really really nothing better to do reply 285 07/03/05 @20:53 The elephant chain with Nicole, Naomi and Heath is kinda weird. He doesn't look back at Nicole in any of those photos--like he's trying to stay far away. by: Anonymous reply 286 07/03/05 @21:13 yeah, i noticed that too r286. oh and r285, i want to have your babies. by: Anonymous reply 287 07/04/05 @01:17 Yes, that's true, in the original set there's maybe like two pics where Heath is actually looking at Nicole, otherwise they don't interact at all. If they ever slept/been together, around this time must have been it's peak. And could you imagine if Nicole or Naomi ever read this thread.... hahaha. I hope they get a good laught at least. by: we probably will never know the truth... SIGH. reply 288 07/04/05 @02:39 like skeletons clawing at each other.... by: Anonymous reply 289 07/04/05 @03:03 ^Being fat and jealous are we? Hmmmmmmmmm? by: Anonymous reply 290 07/04/05 @03:34 If you're scrolling through the gallery, you really have to believe. Very often there are pictures that can be misinterpreted... But over 100...? We are, btw, building an altar to praise you, R285. by: Anonymous reply 291 07/04/05 @03:48 Let's unite the fangirls shall we? see link by: Anonymous reply 292 07/04/05 @04:40 Have any of you checked out Naomi in the Aussie mini-series 'Brides of Christ'? Also, the scenes between her and Lori Petty in 'Tank Girl'.... Trying to find a link... by: Anonymous reply 293 07/04/05 @05:51 I've seen Tank Girl but not the TV series. What about it? by: Anonymous reply 294 07/04/05 @05:59 'brides of christ' set in a covent school for girls, all about repressed feelings and teenage angst set against a back-drop of the papal changes in the sixties. I first saw this in the early nineties and fell 'in lust' with Naomi right there and then :-) by: Anonymous reply 295 07/04/05 @06:12 Sounds interesting indeed. by: Anonymous reply 296 07/04/05 @07:36 Okay, so in this clip Naomi seems kinda pissed off (heh) but never the less she talks about Nicole. Aww. see link by: Anonymous reply 297 07/04/05 @08:06 Thanks 297! (You're on NKU, aren't you?) That video was kinda weird. She seems jaded, like she's just rattling off a speech she's given too many times, and at the same time she seems a bit embarrassed. by: Anonymous reply 298 07/04/05 @09:31 Don't know r298, got the link IM from a friend. She also sent me this clip of Alison Janney (who I love) talking about Nicole, she seems much more at ease. But they don't have the same connection so it really doesn't count. But yeah, she does seems a bit embarrassed but even more irritated I think. by: Anonymous reply 299 07/04/05 @10:11 300. Well someone had to. by: Anonymous reply 300 07/04/05 @11:18

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  of 12

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]