Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Original Post Are they lovers or just good mates? by: Anonymous 163 posts 03/18/05 @10:28

here we go again... i would say; friends with benefits. (let's pray for it y'all.) see link by: Anonymous reply 1 03/22/05 @05:02 lesbos for sure by: Anonymous reply 2 03/22/05 @05:17 Naomi pings harder than most of the girls rumored here, imho. But I have always sided with Nicole is a-sexual crowd here at DL. I just didn't see her having sex at all in her lifetime, not even with herself. But I have to say, every picture of them together, Nicole seems to be really into Naomi. And not just, we are mates and like the same fotty team. She likes her the same way I like her. In fact, she actually seems attractive when with Naomi, maybe because she seems remotely happy. I hope they are. They will never come out, but they seem like they would be a good couple. by: Anonymous reply 3 03/22/05 @12:36 Even thought she did nothing to help her further her career when Nicole's was soaring and Naomi's was in the gutter. Naomi's too good for Nicole. by: Naomi Watts Troll #2 reply 4 03/22/05 @12:40 Reply 4, you have got to be kidding. The reason why Naomi is soaring now is because of being noticed because of her friendship(whatever is) to Nicole. Nicole's success eventually went to Naomi. You are so wrong on that point. by: Anonymous reply 5 03/22/05 @12:47 You have got to be kidding, #5. Did you see Mulholland Drive? Naomi was brilliant. THAT's what got her noticed. She has way more talent than Kidman. by: NW2 reply 6 03/22/05 @12:51 breast friends by: Anonymous reply 7 03/22/05 @12:53 Naomi says that her mother and Nicole were most important in helping her keep her spirits alive in Hollywood when she was getting nowhere. She said Nicole was wonderful to her and told her to never give up hope. I think they're very close friends and were possibly lovers at one point. But I don't think they're lovers now. Plus, Nicole seems to have actually developed a real relationship with Steve Bing, that rich, Hollywood playboy. by: Anonymous reply 8 03/22/05 @12:53 I don't get an asexual vibe from Nicole. I get a closet freak vibe from her. Same with Martha Stewart. They may look frigid but I bet they're secretly wild. And I think Naomi's hit it... by: Anonymous reply 9 03/22/05 @13:13 "Plus, Nicole seems to have actually developed a real relationship with Steve Bing, that rich, Hollywood playboy." Uh... Besides the fact that that whole thing seemed pretty contrived, she dumped him a month or two ago and was promptly linked to a rather gay-looking male producer (at Universal, IIRC). by: Anonymous reply 10 03/22/05 @13:17 I just saw pictures of Nicole and Steve Bing this week. They were in Sydney together. by: Anonymous reply 11 03/22/05 @13:42 Wehn you look at that picture and the way they are with each other-the body language and looks only say one thing- we are a couple. I have seen this in other pictures of them prior to the above and from a few years ago. I hope they are a couple-you should never let someone like that go that you look at that way. by: Anonymous reply 12 03/22/05 @19:11 the sad thing we will probably never ever know. :/ by: Anonymous reply 13 03/23/05 @00:06 omg - COME ON NOW. They SCREAM couple. That's the most chemistry I've seen in a photo in a long time. They have more chemistry than many married couple photos. Nicole didn't look at Tom like that. Plus, they're holding hands. Yeah - they're lovers now or were in the past. For sure. by: Anonymous reply 14 03/23/05 @00:17 I've seen one photo that's been posted here several times where they're foreheads are nearly touching. It looks like an engagement announcement photo. Sure, call it projecting, maybe it is, but I agree with those who say their body language hints at an intimacy "just good friends" just don't have. by: Melanie Wilkes-Booth reply 15 03/23/05 @00:25 I don't agree that that picture screams couple. Those are pictures of two longtime friends, beautiful women who know they are beautiful, enjoying themselves at a party. by: Anonymous reply 16 03/23/05 @00:34 uh --- ok r16. sure. (n-a-i-v-e...) by: Anonymous reply 17 03/23/05 @00:38 isn't Bing the asshole who got Elizabeth Hurley pregnant, then denied he was the father, fought paternity testing... and promptly lost because the baby is HIS? Yup, thought so. He came off horrendously during that episode. Nicole, good luck with that. by: Anonymous reply 18 03/23/05 @00:48 is she the only one who will take him, is she THAT desperate?? eek, poor nicole. by: Anonymous reply 19 03/23/05 @01:21 Nicole is a great lady. You'll be hearing from my lawyers. I don't know this Naomi chick, but Nicole is 100% straight, buddy, you can take that to the bank. by: Tom Cruise reply 20 03/23/05 @01:39 Oh Thomas you can't fool us. by: Anonymous reply 21 03/23/05 @02:17 "two longtime friends, beautiful women who know they are beautiful, enjoying themselves at a party." Holding hands, knowing that they make a beautiful couple, enjoying the fact that they're hiding in plain sight. r16, did you see the one where Nicole had her arm around Naomi's shoulder and was gazing lovingly down her cleavage? It was on here a while back. I'll link it. see link by: Anonymous reply 22 03/23/05 @02:49 In fact, you might want to take a look at this thread. see link by: Anonymous reply 23 03/23/05 @02:51 aww look at the lovebirds! see link by: Anonymous reply 24 03/23/05 @03:01 this pic of them is VERY VERY gay. look at how nicole is caressing namoi's shoulder!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 25 03/23/05 @03:02 holding hands again? I say gay! see link by: Anonymous reply 26 03/23/05 @03:03 the lovers enjoying a laugh together by: Anonymous reply 27 03/23/05 @03:04 s see link by: r27 reply 28 03/23/05 @03:05 notice noami is there with her "boyfriend" heath ledger yet all her attention is on her sapphic love nicole!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 29 03/23/05 @03:06 they are about to make out!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 30 03/23/05 @03:07

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

oops pic in r25 here. SO GAY!!! see link by: Anonymous reply 31 03/23/05 @03:10 Naomi and Heath were Ted's favorite couple to trash before he started on Orlando and Kate. He doesn't like PR-on-speed, so that said it all to me. by: Anonymous reply 32 03/23/05 @03:19 R 25 & 26: Delete the second http:// in the link box when you copy a link. That's why your pictures aren't working. Look at the addresses in your address box at the top of your links and you'll see what I mean. by: Anonymous reply 33 03/23/05 @03:22 I work in the industry. Here's the scoop: Naomi is gay and wildly possessive and jealous. Nicole is bisexual and despite the cold exterior, is a sex freak who will try anything once. The two were involved at one point but are not any longer. by: Anonymous reply 34 03/23/05 @03:36 This picture is revealing. Would that be Nicole pressed up against Naomi and Naomi's hand on Nicole's leg? Obviously they have a hard time keeping off each other. Heath who...?? see link by: Anonymous reply 35 03/23/05 @03:37 thanks, lemme try again! lol see link by: Anonymous reply 36 03/23/05 @03:39 R35 I think it's the camera that makes them seem so close in that photo. Telephoto lenses compress space. If you see how naturally Nicole is standing, and leaning, she couldn't possibly be pressed against Naomi. There's space in front of Nicole, we just can't see it. by: Anonymous reply 37 03/23/05 @04:20 That may be true, r37, but I still see Naomi's left hand reaching back toward Nicole. The angle of the hand itself, not to mention the arm reaching. It also looks like Nicole's right hand is on Naomi's shoulder (again). You can see Nicole's knuckles there if you enlarge the picture. It looks to me like Nicole is definitely touching Naomi and Naomi is trying to touch Nicole. Heath is the definition of a third wheel in that picture. I stand by my original conclusion. by: Anonymous reply 38 03/23/05 @04:38 Oh please, neither of them are gay. Get off it! by: Anonymous reply 39 03/23/05 @04:50 R39, how do you know? by: My Name reply 40 03/23/05 @05:03 "Oh please, neither of them are gay. Get off it!" And George and Eric from "CSI" are just good friends, too! And that Rock Hudson was actually a straight man and he just got a bad rap! As for Garbo fucking chicks? Please. She just wanted to be left alone! Yeah, that's the ticket... by: Anonymous reply 41 03/23/05 @09:02 The picture from R26 is the most telling. There is something very intimate in the way their hands are positioned. Like they were letting go, but didn't want to. And they are quite a cute couple. by: Anonymous reply 42 03/23/05 @09:41 When you look at that picture and the way they are with each other-the body language and looks only say one thing- we are a couple. I have seen this in other pictures of them prior to the above and from a few years ago. I hope they are a couple-you should never let someone like that go that you look at that way. I posted this yesterday and after looking at the rest of those pictures(someone has a lot of time on their hands but I am glad for it), I am even more convinced. Though I do get the feeling that Nicole would be the more possessive type but you never do know about a person. by: Anonymous reply 43 03/23/05 @10:00 R43 I have to say that the pictures all point to Nicole looking much more possesive so I would have to agree. But who knows. by: Anonymous reply 44 03/23/05 @10:02 R39, you're so full of shit. And you're so straight it hurts. What are you doing on a gay gossip board? They're gay, and they've slept together. They look at each other exactly the way two women do who've been intimate in the past. It doesn't necessarily mean they are currently, but that spark is sexual chemisty that's been acted on, and that they still refer to. And as to how we know? I've said it before to the dumb, clueless straight women who scream they're just good friends who hold hands and wind their arms around each other (and allll beautiful women do that when they party together blah blah blah): because some of us have had platonic female friends and female lovers, and we can see the difference easily. I'm one of them. You can see it in person, and you can see it in some photos. Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts make it easy. Not all women do, but they sure do. Also, it's not like the rumors are new and surprising. They've been plentiful out of Australia and here for years. Remember that team on "Amazing Race" -- Bianca and Debbie -- whom we all knew were lovers even though they claimed only to be "best friends from the time we were kids"? They hugged, cuddled, and said "I love you" all the time. Lived together, etc. Very similar dynamic to the NK/NW relationship, but because they weren't celebs, nobody screamed when people said, duh, they're lovers. by: Anonymous reply 45 03/23/05 @10:16 gay! by: Anonymous reply 46 03/23/05 @10:28 That picture with Heath in it looks like Nicole was added-why would she be behind them so close-and it looks like Nicole from years ago with redder, curlier hair. Nice try. Though I agree totally with reply 45. by: Anonymous reply 47 03/23/05 @10:31 I think they're best mates and dirty flirts. I'm sure they pick up the tabloids on the way back from a big night schmoozing and squeal with laughter to see how much they've got away with. by: Anonymous reply 48 03/23/05 @10:39 They are lovers. by: Anonymous reply 49 03/23/05 @11:50 R48, you're straight, aren't you? by: Anonymous reply 50 03/23/05 @12:03 bump by: Anonymous reply 51 03/23/05 @14:15 If Naomi is gay and not even bi, where was Heath getting his kicks during the time he "dated" Naomi? Is he gay as well? Just asking. by: Anonymous reply 52 03/23/05 @14:31 R52, both people don't have to be gay or bi in a "relationship" that is orchestrated by publicists. The other person is getting something out of it, although what it is may not be obvious. It may be money, it may be more exposure than they'd get on their own. It may be their own little piece on the side, paid in full. You need to learn how Hollywood really works. It's ALL about image. by: Anonymous reply 53 03/23/05 @14:40 r47 - The pic you refer to is not tampered with - it is from the opening of the ring in LA - there are a million pics from the event. by: Anonymous reply 54 03/23/05 @14:59 Oh, and R45 - I love you. by: R54 reply 55 03/23/05 @15:04 \ by: Anonymous reply 56 03/23/05 @17:10 have they ever been an BI?? as a couple/lovers i mean? solo, Nicole was a BI once during her break-up with Tom. it was hinted that she really enjoyed women instead, she practically was outed as a bisexual. i think it was in the NY Daily or something Daily at least :D never read an gay BI on Naomi though. by: Anonymous reply 57 03/23/05 @20:43 "Are they lovers or just good mates?" More like nearly identical twins. Could they look more alike? by: Anonymous reply 58 03/23/05 @21:31 I don't think they look anything alike... by: Anonymous reply 59 03/23/05 @21:45 I work in the industry. Here's the scoop: Naomi is gay and wildly possessive and jealous. Nicole is bisexual and despite the cold exterior, is a sex freak who will try anything once. The two were involved at one point but are not any longer. I always got that vibe from other pics I've seen. It always looks like Naomi is looking adoring at Nicole with that "I'm in love" gaze. Not so much on Nicole's part. Naomi looks scream "longing." by: Anonymous reply 60 03/23/05 @22:02

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]

Forum -> Thread Postings

Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

true by: Anonymous reply 61 03/23/05 @22:44 bumpedy-bump by: Anonymous reply 62 03/24/05 @06:35 lol by: Anonymous reply 63 03/24/05 @09:08 Both scream gay.No doubt about that. by: Anonymous reply 64 03/24/05 @14:48 Naomi is so much hotter, shorter and more talented than the former Mrs. Snooze. At least she worked for her career and didn't beard for it. Cheers to Naomi. by: Anonymous reply 65 03/24/05 @16:36 Yeah Naomi sure did work for her career. Right into Nicole's pants. As soon as that divorce was final - Nicole pushed the hell out of Naomi's career. She does have the talent to get it done - but so do a whole lot of people without powerful people to help them. Plus, she is too bearding for her career - she is hardly honest screaming about her relationship with merkin Heath Ledger. He is as much of a whore as Kidman is. by: Anonymous reply 66 03/29/05 @17:20 should be SHE is as much of a whore. Sorry, english is not my primary language. by: Anonymous reply 67 03/29/05 @17:21 lovers by: Anonymous reply 68 03/29/05 @17:24 actually no, david lynch was the one who lauched naomi's career. by: Anonymous reply 69 03/30/05 @07:16 Naomi and Nicole have known each other since they were teenagers, R66. Why would Nicole decide to "push" Naomi's career 15 years after they met? by: Anonymous reply 70 03/30/05 @09:41 Naomi once contemplated suicide What kind of a lover/BFF is Nicole to let Naomi wander the streets destitute? Naomi could do so much better ;) see link by: Anonymous reply 71 04/01/05 @14:42 Nicole is worth tens of millions and her best pal is living out of a car? I would at least have my friend live in the pool house. by: Anonymous reply 72 04/01/05 @19:39 I made a gallery of all the pics if them together I could find. And no, I really don't have anything better to do. see link by: Anonymous reply 73 04/01/05 @19:50 For fuck's sake, after looking at those pictures the only thing that could make them seem gayer is footage of them going down on each other. Imagine if two famous, supposedly straight men carried on with each other like that. by: Anonymous reply 74 04/01/05 @19:55 Wow, r71, I had no idea it was that bad. And yet Naomi dropped everything and moved in with Nicole to deal with her issues after Tom left? Even if they aren't/weren't lovers what the hell kinda friendship is that?! by: Anonymous reply 75 04/01/05 @20:08 r72, i don't think Nicole never offered her a place to stay, i think Naomi really wanted to this own her own. that's the impression i got. she has stated in interviews that she used to crash at Nic's sofa from time to time. (i'm guessing by this she means guest room/house) by: Anonymous reply 76 04/01/05 @20:22 The gallery, loves it! I don't know if they are girlfriends, but I do know that is the most believable romantic partner I have ever seen Nicole Kidman with. She and Bing are just friends ... she recently showed him around Australia when he was down there for business. And other rumored boyfriends of hers ... Lenny Kravitz or Q-Tip ... please! And as for the biggest red flag: Tom Cruise was never believable with her as a loving husband. Believe me, I know! by: Pat Kingsley, Lesbian Publicist reply 77 04/01/05 @20:24 You bitches are all so fucking ridiculous. Seriously. R74 has completely set me off: Female celebrities ALWAYS carry on this way at premieres. Remember when Charlie's Angels premiered and those three bitches were playing with each other's hair and shit on the red carpet? No one objected because these are women acting gay. It's the same here--these two may have had sex in the past, but cripes, but God, don't try to tell me that these pictures are any kind of proof to back up that theory. by: Anonymous reply 78 04/01/05 @20:28 when together, it definitely screams GAY! by: Anonymous reply 79 04/01/05 @20:29 take your meds, r78. i can think of other female friends (Meryl Streep and Carrie Fisher, for example) who are affectionate, but not THAT affectionate. constantly holding hands or near each other physically? do your female friends do that? i doubt it. by: MM reply 80 04/01/05 @20:30 No, they don't, but they're not celebrities who like to have their pictures taken. I'm not convinced, and I won't be by crappy pictures that really aren't at all sexual. by: R78 reply 81 04/01/05 @20:34 R74- NICE And i agree by: Anonymous reply 82 04/01/05 @20:40 Why can't all you negative people just be happy for them? by: Anonymous reply 83 04/01/05 @20:45 They are just touchy-feely, a lot of straight women friends are like that. In college my 2 roomates were like that, they would sleep in the same bed and "cuddle"... (lol... reading what I just typed really makes them sound like lesbians but I swear they aren't) by: Anonymous reply 84 04/01/05 @20:47 I agree that actresses are often affectionate with each other but this goes above and beyond any other famous actress friendships I've ever seen. That gallery R73 put together, you couldn't do that with any other famous friends of any gender. They're more couple-y in their photos than either of them have been with anyone else in their entire careers and that includes a 10-year marriage on Nicole's part. Obviously not everyone will agree but I grew up with straight women and a lot of my friends are straight women and there is normal physical closeness between best friends and then there's "I had her clit in my mouth last night" closeness. by: R74 reply 85 04/01/05 @20:48 I think that the only thing those pictures prove is that these two have a genuine, loving relationship. Whether lovers or not, they LOVE each other, and that says a lot in Hollywood. As a bi-woman, I've had straight girlfriends with whom I've been just as affectionate as these two in the pictures. Personally, I'd bet they've been together sexually, but I think that the core of their relationship is a deep love and friendship. And that's beautiful. by: Anonymous reply 86 04/01/05 @20:50 R78, because you're the expert on reading photographs now? Give me a break. Why is your opinion of the pictures any more valid than any of ours? Sounds like you know less about having a girlfriend than a lot of us do. Besides, if you'll grant that they were probably together at one time, what's your hang-up about "not seeing it" in the pictures? Just because you don't doesn't mean we're projecting? It might mean your gaydar's worse. You sound pissed at that fact, frankly. And very overwrought about it all. But at least you don't sound homophobic, and that's a breath of fresh air on this thread. R84, you sound young and very naive. You also sound straight. Comparing two lesbians to your roommates is pointless. Try comparing them to a lesbian couple you know; it'll get you farther. If your post included, "whereas my gay best friends hold each other in a much more intimate way," I'd actually think you knew something about the subject. As it is, I think you're just putting your heterocentric opinion into the thread (at least in a nice way), just as all straight people inevitably do. My gf and I slept in the same bed and cuddled, too. You see? There's a difference, and you're missing it, because you only see one side of things. You have to know both sides to get it. by: Anonymous reply 87 04/01/05 @20:56 Wow, loving the gallery, thank you! r86, loving your post! :) and i agree. by: Anonymous reply 88 04/01/05 @21:17 ( r73, are you Swedish? cause your web host is, nice meeting other Sweds on DL ) by: Anonymous reply 89 04/01/05 @21:24 I am actually. :) Wow, didn't think any other Swedes would be up this late, hehe. by: r73 reply 90 04/01/05 @21:41

[Refresh] [Post] Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  of 6

Post a Reply RE: Nicole Kidman and Naomi Watts Message (required) Your Name Leave blank to post anonymously Web Site Link [Help] [Guidelines]