|
^Sadly, yes. Maybe not Nicole since she's already such a big celebrity and if they would handle it all really good maybe her career wouldn't be that much affected. Has any one of you got this pic in a bigger version? I thought I've already seen every pic of them together thanks to that nice gallery.
see link
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 271 |
07/03/05 @07:14 |
|
 |
|
Whoa 271, is that pic for real?! Where'd you get it from? BTW, I just realised they've both been in New York for about a month now. I wonder if they're hanging out at all (not in public obviously).
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 272 |
07/03/05 @07:25 |
|
 |
|
R270 If they came out, I'd watch them MORE. I think knowing that a woman likes to get down with other women makes them so much more attractive. I'd love it!!
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 273 |
07/03/05 @16:29 |
|
 |
|
Actually Naomi was in Philadelphia yesterday as a presenter at the Live 8 concert. I'm bummed I missed it as I was watching London the whole time. And yes, thank god, that pic is real.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 274 |
07/03/05 @16:30 |
|
 |
|
273, So would I, but I'm not straight. circa 90-95% of the population is straight and let's be honest it's not like most people will be all "gooooo lesbians!" and watch them more as well. I think that _some_ directors would think twice before hiring them in a straight part. (But I would loved to be proved wrong of course.)
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 275 |
07/03/05 @16:41 |
|
 |
|
i hate to burst your collective bubble. nicole and naomi are not lovers. naomi is straight. nicole i don't know about.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 276 |
07/03/05 @17:02 |
|
 |
|
heh, i was wondering how long it would take for one of you to finally post in this thread.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 277 |
07/03/05 @17:40 |
|
 |
|
^Who are you refering to? The partypooper r276? Since you know Naomi is straight I take it you know her in firsthand? Otherwise you really don't know. Cause if you knew Naomi you most def have to know about Nicole.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 278 |
07/03/05 @17:49 |
|
 |
|
yeah i mean 276... same crap in every naomi thread. but eh whatever.
|
|
by:
277
|
reply 279 |
07/03/05 @18:03 |
|
 |
|
hey 276, were have you been all this time? waiting for you to show up for three pages now.
|
|
by:
not letting you take the fun away
|
reply 280 |
07/03/05 @18:03 |
|
 |
|
missing an 'h' in 'where', but otherwise that's what I wanted to post.
|
|
by:
R280
|
reply 281 |
07/03/05 @18:05 |
|
 |
|
Thanks @ 271 for picture. I've never seen that one before.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 282 |
07/03/05 @18:11 |
|
 |
|
I love how r276 always makes negative comments and never replies on directed questions. I wanna see that picture in HQ. Damn.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 283 |
07/03/05 @19:25 |
|
 |
|
Yeah, Naomi is sooooo straight.
see link
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 284 |
07/03/05 @19:40 |
|
 |
|
So, I spent some time (ok, a long time) trying to hunt down a bigger version of the lovely pic r271 posted, but no luck sadly. On the plus side though, while hunting I found a bunch of pics that wasn't in the gallery already, so I have updated it. A few more pics added of Naomi and Rebecca at the bottom also.
see link
|
|
by:
Really really nothing better to do
|
reply 285 |
07/03/05 @20:53 |
|
 |
|
The elephant chain with Nicole, Naomi and Heath is kinda weird. He doesn't look back at Nicole in any of those photos--like he's trying to stay far away.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 286 |
07/03/05 @21:13 |
|
 |
|
yeah, i noticed that too r286. oh and r285, i want to have your babies.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 287 |
07/04/05 @01:17 |
|
 |
|
Yes, that's true, in the original set there's maybe like two pics where Heath is actually looking at Nicole, otherwise they don't interact at all. If they ever slept/been together, around this time must have been it's peak. And could you imagine if Nicole or Naomi ever read this thread.... hahaha. I hope they get a good laught at least.
|
|
by:
we probably will never know the truth... SIGH.
|
reply 288 |
07/04/05 @02:39 |
|
 |
|
like skeletons clawing at each other....
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 289 |
07/04/05 @03:03 |
|
 |
|
^Being fat and jealous are we? Hmmmmmmmmm?
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 290 |
07/04/05 @03:34 |
|
 |
|
If you're scrolling through the gallery, you really have to believe. Very often there are pictures that can be misinterpreted... But over 100...? We are, btw, building an altar to praise you, R285.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 291 |
07/04/05 @03:48 |
|
 |
|
Let's unite the fangirls shall we?
see link
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 292 |
07/04/05 @04:40 |
|
 |
|
Have any of you checked out Naomi in the Aussie mini-series 'Brides of Christ'? Also, the scenes between her and Lori Petty in 'Tank Girl'.... Trying to find a link...
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 293 |
07/04/05 @05:51 |
|
 |
|
I've seen Tank Girl but not the TV series. What about it?
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 294 |
07/04/05 @05:59 |
|
 |
|
'brides of christ' set in a covent school for girls, all about repressed feelings and teenage angst set against a back-drop of the papal changes in the sixties. I first saw this in the early nineties and fell 'in lust' with Naomi right there and then :-)
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 295 |
07/04/05 @06:12 |
|
 |
|
Sounds interesting indeed.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 296 |
07/04/05 @07:36 |
|
 |
|
Okay, so in this clip Naomi seems kinda pissed off (heh) but never the less she talks about Nicole. Aww.
see link
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 297 |
07/04/05 @08:06 |
|
 |
|
Thanks 297! (You're on NKU, aren't you?) That video was kinda weird. She seems jaded, like she's just rattling off a speech she's given too many times, and at the same time she seems a bit embarrassed.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 298 |
07/04/05 @09:31 |
|
 |
|
Don't know r298, got the link IM from a friend. She also sent me this clip of Alison Janney (who I love) talking about Nicole, she seems much more at ease. But they don't have the same connection so it really doesn't count. But yeah, she does seems a bit embarrassed but even more irritated I think.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 299 |
07/04/05 @10:11 |
|
 |
|
300. Well someone had to.
|
|
by:
Anonymous
|
reply 300 |
07/04/05 @11:18 |
|